(via annapear)
February 8th, 2013
January 31st, 2013
(via carissajoy)
January 22nd, 2013
January 21st, 2013
Lets go for a drive…
(Source: rhyminslang, via hungryidahoan)
January 16th, 2013
You may not agree with a woman, but to criticize her appearance — as opposed to her ideas or actions — isn’t doing anyone any favors, least of all you. Insulting a woman’s looks when they have nothing to do with the issue at hand implies a lack of comprehension on your part, an inability to engage in high-level thinking. You may think she’s ugly, but everyone else thinks you’re an idiot.
Hillary Clinton (via unhappie)
(Source: smellslikegirlriot, via mmonson)
January 15th, 2013
that’s the ticket
(Source: meineigenesblog, via amwaldo)
January 13th, 2013
(Source: hikariiii, via ourseattle)
January 9th, 2013
Voices: The Django Debate from Racialicious
I’m really glad I got to read this post from Racialicious on Django. It’s a great post to learn about racial dialogue and to hear lots of perspectives on Django.
January 5th, 2013
yup
(via ourseattle)
January 2nd, 2013
December 21st, 2012
There are too many ways that I love this.
(Source: erikavan, via ourseattle)
December 12th, 2012
December 1st, 2012
working on a saturday stinks
(Source: smilebooth, via finisshit)
November 30th, 2012
So what is the real argument? The other lie to nail is that people who “believe in the Bible” or who “take it literally” will oppose women’s ordination. Rubbish. Yes, I Timothy ii is usually taken as refusing to allow women to teach men. But serious scholars disagree on the actual meaning, as the key Greek words occur nowhere else. That, in any case, is not where to start.
How is it possible that N.T. Wright can dislodge 1 Tim 2 from its powerful misappropriation in just 5 sentences?
I couldn’t be more pleased.
(Source: fulcrum-anglican.org.uk)
